Campaigning for Human Rights and Democracy in Burma Contact Details
Email Us
Home The Burma Campaign UK News & Reports Campaigns Join/Donate About Burma About Us Links
Last modified 8 Feb 04
Campaigns
 


In the run up to the 2001 general election in the UK we asked some of the main political parties what policies they would pursue to promote human rights and democracy in Burma.

We also asked whether they would support investment sanctions, which Aung San Suu Kyi and the Burma Campaign UK are calling for.

Here are the responses we received.

 
 
Search
Election News
 
 
 

labour
The Labour Party is deeply concerned about the political, economic and human rights situation in Burma and considers the regime's violations of human rights as wholly unacceptable. We recognise the outcome of the 1990 general election where the national League for Democracy was elected by a landslide.

The government is exerting pressure on the Burmese to engage in substantive dialogue with political leaders, including Aung San Suu Kyi, leader of the national League for Democracy. The view of the British government is that progress will only be made in Burma through a political solution, one that recognises democratic rights and human rights. The Labour government has taken action, announcing in June 1997 that it would not provide any financial support to companies for trade missions to Burma or for trade promotion activities in Burma.

Britain also used its presidency of the European Union to renew EU measures against the regime and drafted last year's United nations resolution on Burma. The Labour government will continue to work for a democratic Burma and press for this through the international institutions of which we are a member.


conservative party
The Conservative Party is deeply concerned about the human rights situation in Burma. The issue is one close to our hearts. We are pleased that human rights activist James Mawdsley has chosen to join us and campaign for us in the coming election. His seventeen-month imprisonment, for distributing leaflets which were critical of the ruling junta, did much to bring to the attention of British people the human rights situation in Burma.

Throughout Mr. Mawdsley's imprisonment the Conservative Party actively campaigned for his release. In October, Shadow Foreign Secretary Francis Maude welcomed Mr Mawdsley's release from prison. He said: "It must be a great relief for his family that James Mawdsley is now on the way home. He has done much to raise the issue of human rights in Burma on the world stage. His arrest and imprisonment at the hands of the Burmese Government was an outrageous abuse of human rights and an attack on freedom of speech".

Conservatives believe that the issue of sanctions regarding Burma must be treated with the utmost caution. It is very important that any decision taken by the British government does not adversely affect the very people we are trying to protect. In government we will aim to find a lasting and substantive democratic solution to the human rights situation in Burma.


liberal democrats

The Liberal Democrats have been closely following events Myanmar and have supported Aung San Suu Kyi's efforts to bring democracy to her country. We recognise her as the legitimate leader of the Burmese people since the elections of May 1990 were annulled by the military administrators of Myanmar, the State Peace and Development Council (SPDC). We condemn the continued detention of members of the National League for Democracy and support the EU Common Position on Myanmar which demands the unconditional release of all political prisoner.

Dr Jenny Tonge, the party's International Development spokesperson has met with the Prime Minister of the National Coalition Government of Burma and has signed their declaration in which Members of Parliament across the world show their solidarity with the democratically elected members of Burma.

Liberal Democrats have supported calls for international sanctions against Myanmar. In the light of the International Development Select Committee recent report, 'The Future of Sanctions' we feel that there is evidence to suggest that purely economic sanctions more frequently do not target those truly responsible while increasing suffering of civilian populations. We would like to see the establishment of a UN body with responsibility for targeting financial sanctions and the establishment of an Office of Foreign Assets Control so that individuals and states are more effectively targeted.
The Liberal Democrats will continue to put pressure on the British Government to press for dialogue with the SPDC, to ensure that the situation in Burma changes and for an increased role by the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) in the refugee camps along the Thai-Burma border. We would also like to see a permanent UN Human rights monitor in eastern Burma to investigate human rights violations.

Liberal Democrats will continue to urge our Government and the European Union to take every opportunity to put pressure on the SPDC to restore democracy in Myanmar. In particular, we hope that the UK Government's recent decision to discourage Premier Oil from operating in Burma is the beginning of more concrete action being taken. We are encouraged by the groundswell among Premier Oil's shareholders, evident at the company's last annual general meeting, that the pressure put on Premier Oil's executives will force them to think again about their investments


the green party of england and wales
The Green Party of England and Wales has no hesitation in supporting strengthened sanctions on investment and trade against the present government in Burma. The combination of repression and human rights abuses accompanied by calls for sanctions by Aung San Suu Kyi for the democratic opposition makes the case undeniable.

We also support a change to the rules on international trade that make most sanctions on trade illegal. This is only one of the ways in which the World Trade Organisation is structured against improving human rights and environmental protection, which we wish to change.

As well as preventing trade sanctions, existing international trade rules positively encourage the exploitation of Burma's natural resources, often using low-paid or slave labour. The current Burmese government makes protest against mass deforestation and strip-mining almost impossible, as it does any protest against the status quo. We would support a boycott of Burmese wood and metals (including copper).

The only people visiting Burma, at present, should be diplomats and UN representatives demanding fair and free elections and improvements to human rights in the country. Tourists can only lend the present Burmese government credibility and bring them revenue. Greens support the campaign against the sale of holidays and tourist guides for the area.

A vote for the Greens is a clear vote in support of human rights and environmental protection. The Greens are also strongly committed to transparency and openness in government, and minimising the influence of corporate interests. Oppression is not sustainable. The people of Burma, with support from the rest of the world, will be free.